AI & Copyright

A gold-framed photo dissolving into particles that reform as a neural network, symbolising images used to train AI
AI & Copyright

Getty v. Stability AI Explained — What It Means for Creators

It was billed as the case that would decide whether AI companies can train on your work. Then the UK court handed down its verdict — and the headlines said Getty lost. But the real story is more useful, and more nuanced, than any headline. Here’s Getty v. Stability AI in plain English: what Getty actually claimed, why it mostly lost in the UK, why the US case is far from over, and what all of it means for you as a creator.

A gold robotic hand stopped by a barrier just short of an empty ornate picture frame, symbolising a machine denied authorship of a work
AI & Copyright

Thaler v. Perlmutter: Why AI Can’t Hold a Copyright (and Why It Matters to You)

A man built an AI, told the Copyright Office the AI made a picture entirely on its own, and asked to register the machine as the author. The government said no, and in March 2025 a federal appeals court agreed: under US law, a copyright needs a human author. But the case is far narrower — and far more useful to you — than the scary headline suggests. Here’s the plain-English version, and exactly what it changes for creators who use AI tools.

Scroll to Top