Author name: Raymond

Three small gold artist figures standing together facing a towering AI neural network, symbolising artists taking on AI companies
AI & Copyright

Andersen v. Stability AI: The Artists’ Class Action, Explained

Three working artists took on the biggest names in AI image generation — and started the case that could decide whether training AI on your art without permission is legal. Here’s Andersen v. Stability AI in plain English: who’s suing, what they claim, what the court has already decided, the huge question still unanswered, and what all of it means for you.

Gold-edged legal volumes dissolving into particles that reform as a search bar, symbolising Westlaw content used to build a rival AI tool
AI & Copyright

Thomson Reuters v. Ross: The First Big AI Fair-Use Ruling

It was the first time a US court squarely ruled on fair use in an AI copyright case — and the AI company lost. But before you panic or celebrate, read the fine print. Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence is narrower and stranger than the headlines suggest, and understanding exactly what Judge Bibas decided (and pointedly did not decide) tells you far more about your rights as a creator than any hot take. Here’s the plain-English version.

A canvas where only the human-painted half glows gold while the machine-made half stays dim, symbolising that only the human-authored part is protected
AI & Copyright

Human Authorship: How Much of Your Work Must Be Yours to Copyright It?

You used an AI tool. You also did real creative work — you chose, arranged, edited, refined. So where’s the line? How much of a piece has to come from you before the Copyright Office will call it yours? There’s no magic percentage, but there IS a workable answer, and it’s more encouraging than the headlines suggest. Here’s the human authorship threshold in plain English, plus a five-minute self-audit to protect the parts that count.

Scroll to Top